Mapping a Life: The Geography of Bondage and Freedom for Alexander Davidge

introduction: a story rooted in place

Antebellum Prince George’s County was a divided world. The world of planters and estates was visible through the creation of Martenet’s Map of Prince George’s County, which documented the landowners and their proximity to seats of power (Upper Marlborough, county seat, as well as the District of Columbia, the nation’s capital) and to transporation routes (the railways, the rivers, the roads). The single black dot on Martenet’s map indicating landowners obscured the outbuildings, quarters, and fields occupied by the enslaved and free Black population of Prince George’s County.

The historical record documents two versions of Alexander (Sandy) Davidge. In one, he is a financial asset, a name on a legal claim filed by his former enslaver six years later. In the other, he is a man of decisive action, self-liberating from a Maryland plantation in the winter of 1861. The gulf between these two records defines not only his story but the divided world of Antebellum Prince George’s County itself, where the landscape of power shown on official maps obscured the complex lives of the enslaved.

the berrys: a multi-district sphere of control

In 1828, Thomas Berry appears in the tax list for Prince George’s county as owning 1300+ acres called Oxon Hill Manor and 650 acres called Seat Pleasant. Berry acquired these acres through a conveyance from his father, Zachariah Berry “of Concord” and through his 1815 marriage to Mary Williams, the would-be heir of Thomas Otho Williams, d. 1818. Their son, Thomas E. Berry would own property in Queen Anne District in the Partnership Neighborhood, in addition to managing his father’s Oxon Hill Manor estate. Other branches of the Berry family would own land in Bladensburg, including the estates of Concord, Graden, and Independence demonstrating the scope of control the Berry network had on the lives of the enslaved people.

Martenet’s 1861 Map of Prince George’s County showing the location of Oxon Hill Manor, Seat Pleasant, and Partnership, properties owned by Thomas Berry, Mary Berry and Thomas E. Berry, their son.

Alexander (Sandy) Davidge labored for Mary Berry at Seat Pleasant. He was first named in an 1847 deed of separation between Mary Berry and her husband, Thomas Berry. Due to “unhappy differences” that have arisen between the husband and wife. In exchange for the property settlement, Mary gives up any future claim to dower rights on Thomas Berry’s separate estate. Thomas and Mary Berry transfer a significant amount of property to the trustee, Elisha W. Williams, for the sole benefit of Mary Berry. This property includes:

  • Land, specifically part of a tract called “Seat Pleasant,” which is explicitly identified as having “came to the said Mary Berry as one of the heirs of her deceased Father [Thos. O. Williams]”.
  • Livestock, including hogs, sheep, cows, and horses.
  • Farm equipment and crops, including “thirty hogsheads of tobacco”.
  • A community of enslaved people, who are listed by name.

Among them, is “Sandy”.

The list minimally names relationships between members of the community forced to work in the tobacco fields, to care for the livestock and to tend to the farm equipment. From the list, there are some spouses and some children — and other relationships (siblings, cousins, etc.) are ignored and invisible. While the deed explicitly names the wives of Jerry and Sam Butler and the children of Kitty and Caroline, Sandy is listed between Thomas/Tom and Kitty, an individual seemingly untethered to any named kin in that moment.

Prince George’s County, Maryland, Land Records, Deed of Separation, Thomas Berry and Mary Berry to Elisha W. Williams, trustee, November 10, 1847, Liber JBB 5, folio 102, accessed via MDLANDREC, mdlandrec.net.

Sandy was also listed in the inventory of Mary Berry’s estate when she died a decade later in 1857. A twenty-year old man, the appraisers assigned him an external market value of $1050. The appraiser’s commodification of Sandy rested on their value of his ability to provide physical labor. Charles was nineteen years old, and externally appraised for $1100 while Walter (Wat) was twenty-two years old, and externally appraised for $900.

Like the deed of separation, Sandy, Walter, and the others are untethered in their relationships. Unlike other other inventories who adhere to one of two organizational patterns ( by gender and chronological age, or by adult males, and mother-child groupings), the list of Mary Berry’s estate includes the names of those she enslaved in a non-recognized order. Mimey and Polly, two elderly woman, head the list, despite the inclusion of other elderly men (Tony and Ned); Eliza, Sarah, Jane, pre-adolescent girls are listed immediately following Tony without a mother, suggesting a possible loss prior to the inventory. Alternatively, the list could be organized by sphere of work, with the first half (headed by elderly woman) representing those who labored in the household, while the second half representing the field hands.

Prince George’s County, Maryland. Register of Wills (Inventories). WAJ 1:673. Maryland State Archives, Annapolis, MD.

The death of Mary Berry, the mistress of Seat Pleasant, and the appraiser cataloguing her furniture, agricultural implements and enslaved community precipitated precipitated a forceful fragmentation of that community, initiating an unasked-for migration that scattered kin across the distinct agricultural landscapes of Prince George’s County.

Martenet’s 1861 Map of Prince George’s County showing the fragmentation of the community enslaved by Mary Berry

A few months after her death, the Planters’ Advocate advertised the sale of Mary Berry’s estates, both real and personal:

Planters’ Advocate, Feb 23, 1858
Sale of Mary Berry’s “Servants”, Feb 3, 1858
Transcription of Estate Sale Advertisement

A VALUABLE ESTATE FOR SALE, Containing Eight Hundred and Twenty-Four and One-Fourth Acres.

BY virtue of a decree of the Circuit Court for Prince George’s county, sitting as a Court of Equity, the subscriber, as Trustee, will offer at public sale, on the premises, ON FRIDAY, the 11th day of March next, if fair, if not, the next fair day thereafter, the VALUABLE REAL ESTATE of the late Mary Berry, containing, by a recent survey, EIGHT HUNDRED AND TWENTY-FOUR ACRES AND ONE-FOURTH OF AN ACRE.

This estate is situated in Prince George’s County, very near the District line, commanding a beautiful view of the Capitol and a portion of Washington City.

The improvements are a good comfortable Dwelling House, KITCHEN, and all the necessary OUT-HOUSES, including STABLES and CARRIAGE HOUSE. The Farm Houses consist of four or five TOBACCO HOUSES, in a good state of repair, and affords room enough to house fifty thousand pounds of tobacco.

This farm consists of a soil well adapted to the growth of the finest quality of Tobacco and all the other staple crops grown in the county. Has a sufficiency of MEADOW LAND, some of it TIMBER, and also an abundance of WOOD and TIMBER.

This land, from its proximity to Washington City, affords a rare chance for speculation and a profitable investment. Portions of it might be profitably cultivated in Fruits and Vegetables, in addition to making a Tobacco Farm.

THE TERMS OF SALE, AS PRESCRIBED BY DECREE, ARE: A cash payment of one thousand dollars to be made on the day of sale, and the balance of the purchase money to be paid in three equal instalments, in twelve, eighteen, and twenty-four months; the whole purchase money to be secured by the bond of the purchaser, with security to be approved by the Trustee, and to bear interest from the day of sale. Upon the payment of the purchase money and interest, the Trustee is authorized by the decree to convey the land to the purchaser in fee simple, and all the right, title, claim and interest of the parties to the cause, and of all those claiming by, through or under them or either of them.

Possession of the property will be delivered as soon as the terms of sale are complied with.

Those wishing to purchase are invited to view the premises, and are referred to A. B. BERRY, Esq., who owns the adjoining farm.

C. C. MAGRUDER, Trustee. Upper Marlboro’, Feb. 16, 1859—ts

Transcription of Sale of “Servants”

Sale of Servants.

The personal estate of the late Mary Berry was sold last week. The following servants were disposed of:

Negro man Sandy brought $1205, and was purchased by Mrs. Grace H. Clagett. Negro man Charles $1180—purchaser Mr. R. M. Williams. Negro boy Wat $1005—purchaser Mr. Thomas. Berry. Negro woman Polly $265—purchased by the same gentleman. Negro man John $725—purchaser Mr. Robert M. Williams. Negro man Ned $355—purchaser Mr. Thomas E. Berry. Negro woman Minny $265—purchased by the same gentleman. Negro man Thomas $650—purchaser Mr. A. B. Berry. Negro woman Anne $400—purchaser Mr. Wm. F. Berry. Negro man Sam $736—purchaser Mr. A. B. Berry. Negro man Jim $606—purchaser Mr. Thomas E. Berry. Negro girl Jane $580—purchaser Mr. Wm. B. Boggs. Negro man Jerry $205—purchaser Mr. E. T. Berry. Negro woman Barbara $205—purchaser by the same gentleman. Negro girl Sarah $650—purchaser Mr. Thomas E. Berry. Negro man Tony $275—purchaser Mr. John E. Bowie. Negro man Buster $135—purchaser Mr. Robert M. Williams. Negro woman Minny and child $1105—purchaser Mr. John E. Berry, Jr. Negro boy George $735—purchaser Mr. Fielder Magruder. Negro woman Kitty and three children $1430; purchaser Mr. Zachariah Berry of Z. Negro girl Eliza $620—purchased by the same gentleman. Negro woman Polly and two children $1000—purchaser Mr. John E. Berry. Negro woman Joyce $100—purchaser Mr. T. E. Berry.

At the 1858 estate sale, the community was fragmented; a twenty-year-old Sandy was sold for $1205, while his peers Charles (19) and Walter (22) brought $1180 and $1005 respectively.

the clagetts: the widow’s residence

Sandy was purchased by Grace H. Clagett, a widow who managed her assets from her parents’ residence of Mount Pleasant. The daughter of Col. Henry Waring and Sarah Harrison, she had married Dr. Richard H. Clagett who died in the early 1850s, leaving her with her son, Henry W. Clagett. She managed at least two farms prior to her own death in 1860.

In the fall and winter of 1857, she advertised in the Planters’ Advocate for the hire of additional field hands before purchasing Sandy at the sale of Mary Berry’s estate.

Despite advertising for two additional men, she only purchased Sandy from Mary Berry’s estate, which meant that Sandy arrived alone and without the comfort of a social network at Mount Pleasant. Any family he had lived with Seat Pleasant had been sent to work at other plantations and estates.

Sandy was taken by the Clagett from a farm near the District, near the roads that led to the bustle of the City of Washington. While working the fields on Seat Pleasant, he would have seen wagons and carts traveling into town filled with produce, with livestock tied to back for butchers. He would have seen stagecoaches and horseback riders traveling with the mail and the guests who would stay at the Hotels on Pennsylvania Ave. When he was forced from Seat Pleasant to Mount Pleasant, the landscape would have changed to a waterfront, where traffic was directed to the steamboats and the small boats that traveled the silting Patuxent. Instead of gentlemen headed to the City of Washington for national politics and markets, he would have seen gentlemen headed to Upper Marlborough, the county seat for estate sales, courthouse dealings, and horse races.

Two years after purchasing Sandy, Grace died on May 1, 1860 after a long illness at her parent’s estate, Mount Pleasant. Without a will and inventory, it is presumed her real and personal estate, including Sandy, was conveyed to Henry W. Clagett, her son. The death of his second enslaver most likely stirred up memories of the last time his enslaver died, with the sale of him and his new community on the auction block. Moreover, his new enslaver, Henry W Clagett, was a young bachelor who had yet to “settle down”. Away at Georgetown for college, his visits home may have been stories of drinking and gambling and other college escapades, which often meant money owed to creditors and debts to be covered by the sale of a “valuable field hand”. This recurring pattern of instability, where his life was subject to the whims of inheritance, now placed his future in the hands of a young, unmarried man, Henry W. Clagett. The prospect of yet another disruption may have been the final catalyst for his decision to escape.

the landscape of Escape

Against this backdop, Alexander (Sandy) Davidge self-liberated himself from Clagett’s estate near Mount Pleasant wearing a brown frock coat and dark hat with black pantaloons the day after Christmas. The week between Christmas and New Years was one of anticipation of separation as enslavers hired out or sold individuals, separating them from the comfort of community within a cold landscape bereft of warmth.

Clagett supposed that Alexander was making his way to family members at Mrs. Thomas E. Berry’s near Long Old Fields, or acquaintances near Bladensburg, suggesting that Sandy was going back to the neighborhood from which he had been extracted, and back to a known community.

Excerpt from the 1861 Martenet Map showing the location of Clagett’s residence and the locations named as possible destinations with their proximity to the District of Columbia.

The portrait of John Mulvaney, 1863 provides a visual possibility of what Alexander Davadge wore on his escape to freedom. Choosing a frock coat (more formal than everyday work wear), it would allow Sandy to blend into the crowds moving through the streets of the City. The frock coat would also provide a layer of warmth as he left in the midst of winter.

Transcription of Bounty for Sandy Davadge

$100 Reward. RAN AWAY from the subscriber, living near Upper Marlborough, on Wednesday, the 26th ultimo, a negro man SANDY, who calls himself

SANDY DAVADGE.

Sandy is about five feet nine or ten inches high; is of a dark complexion; has a full suit of hair and a fine set of teeth; is quick when spoken to, and very polite. He had on when he left home a pair of black pantaloons, brown frock coat and a dark hat. He has relations living at Mrs. Thomas E. Berry’s place, near the Long Old Fields, and also acquaintances in Bladensburg.

I will give the above reward for his apprehension, if taken out of the State of Maryland, and Fifty Dollars if taken in the State—in either case he must be brought home or secured in jail, so that I get him again.

HENRY W. CLAGETT. January 2, 1861—tf

As he traveled the roads, turnpikes and trails into the District where he could make for a “Free State”, he would have been wary of slave patrols, set up to control his movement through the landscape of tobacco fields and orchards. Some were more formally organized and others were suspicious planters and planters’ sons, hiding behind bushes to capture the family fleeing for freedom.

A newspaper clipping detailing the apprehension of a man accused of assisting a runaway slave. The article discusses the capture of a man who was allegedly transporting a woman and her two children in a covered wagon, highlighting concerns over suspected runaway slaves in the area.
“Running Off Negroes,” Port Tobacco Times, and Charles County Advertiser (Port Tobacco, MD), January 3, 1861, p. 3, accessed via Newspapers.com.
Transcription of “Running Off Negroes”

RUNNING OFF NEGROES.—The Pr. Georgian of last Friday says:

This day fortnight ago, Messrs. Francis M. Bowie and John E. Bowie, Jr., having some cause for suspicion of some such occurrence, posted themselves in a suitable position and captured a negro who was carrying off, in the dead of night, a negro woman and her two children, the property of the first named gentleman. They were in a covered wagon. The negro is a slave of a lady residing in Montgomery, and the wagon was borrowed from an officer at the Observatory, for another purpose. The prisoner was brought here the day following and indicted by the Grand Jury. He is now in jail.

“Appointment of a Patrol in Alexandria County.” Evening Star (Washington, D.C.), January 4, 1861. From Newspapers.com.
“Affairs in St. Mary’s County, MD.—Runaway Slaves—Patrols called out.” Evening Star (Washington, D.C.), June 5, 1861. From Newspapers.com.
Transcription of “Appointment of a Patrol in Alexandria County”

APPOINTMENT OF A PATROL IN ALEXANDRIA COUNTY. The Gazette says: “The County Court of this county at its last term, appointed a patrol for the country portion of this county. The appointment was made under the following provision of the Code of Virginia: “The county court of each county may, when necessary, appoint for a term not exceeding three months, one or more patrols, consisting of an officer either commissioned or non-commissioned, who shall be captain of patrol and so many privates as it may think requisite, to patrol and visit within such bounds as the court may prescribe, as often as it shall require, all negro quarters and other places suspected of having therein unlawful assemblies, or such slaves as may stroll from one plantation to another without permission.”

The following gentlemen were named as the patrol:—Wm. J. Garey, Captain; S. Burch, jr., John Marcey, George Marcey, Elijah Burch, Thos. Thompson, Samuel Marcey and Chas. W. Payne, privates.

It is the duty of this patrol to visit all parts of the county, at least once a week; to break up all unlawful assemblies and arrest negroes violating the law. The members of patrol failing to perform duty, are subject to a fine of five dollars, and when on duty the captain is entitled to one dollar and each private to 75 cents for each twelve hours service.

Transcription of “Affairs in the St. Mary’s County, MD”

AFFAIRS IN ST. MARY’S COUNTY, MD.—Runaway Slaves—Patrols called out—The Leonardtown Beacon of Thursday has the following in relation to affairs in that neighborhood:

Three negro men, representing themselves as runaway slaves from Virginia, were arrested and lodged in our county jail on Tuesday last. They crossed the Potomac in a canoe, and were arrested by private citizens and handed over to the sheriff. They were young, likely negroes, and stated that “they had heard a great deal of talk about Maryland, and came over to see if the truth had been told them.” They represent their masters to have been absent from home at the time they determined upon their tour of investigation. We learned on Tuesday last that there had been many recent cases of runaway in this county. Would it not be well to reorganize the system of patrol that proved so efficient here last winter?

Since the abandonment of the patrol, the negroes have pretty generally fallen into their old night-prowling habits and we hear of several who have ran away from their owners and are now lurking in the county. The patrol force has never been legally disbanded, and are consequently at liberty to go upon duty whenever they may think the public interest requires it. We believe that it requires it now, and we recommend that the force in the different districts proceed at once to make an organization and go upon duty and remain upon duty while the present excitement through the country continues to exist. We hope to hear that the patrol force are in active operation in every district of the county by Saturday next.

During the winter of 1861, Southern Maryland was a region of high tension and strategic importance in the Civil War. As a border state with strong secessionist sympathies, particularly in counties like Prince George’s and Charles, the area was under a heavy Union military occupation designed to secure its loyalty and protect the perimeter of Washington, D.C.

This resulted in a significant and visible presence of Union troops guarding crucial infrastructure, such as railroads and key roads. The Potomac River became an active military frontier due to the “Potomac Blockade,” where Confederate batteries on the Virginia side frequently exchanged fire with Union forces in Maryland, disrupting river traffic. This created a volatile atmosphere for refugees from slavery who sought to navigate both troops and patrols on the road to freedom.

disappearance from the Map

After 1861, Alexander (Sandy) Davidge vanishes from the known map.

In 1867, the former slaveholders submitted claims for compensation for the people emancipated by the November 1864 Constitution of Maryland. Henry W. Clagett was one of the enslavers who submitted a claim. On his list was “Sandy Davidge, age 24”, his name one of 54 people enslaved by Clagett. Clagett, by placing him on the list, is stating on oath Davidge was “in his possession” on Nov 1, 1864, after his escape to freedom. There are no records to clarify if Clagett had recaptured him or if he submitted a fraudulent claim.

Alexander’s family, the ones enslaved by Mrs. Thomas E. Berry near Long Old Fields, appears on a list submitted by “Thomas Berry”: Polly (Mary) Davidge, age 50 and WalterDavidge, age 24, purchased from Mary Berry’s estate and likely Alexander’s mother and brother, as well as Esther (Hessy) Davidge, age 34, and Henry Davidge, age 16.

Clagett’s compensation claim in 1867 is an attempt to place him back on the Marlborough plantation ledger, but his physical body is gone. His final destination, his geography of freedom, remains unknown.


Martenet, Simon J. Martenet’s Map of Prince George’s County Maryland. Philadelphia: J.L. Smith, 1861. https://www.mdcourts.gov/lawlib/research/special-collections-room/map-of-prince-georges-county-1861.

The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission. African-American Historic and Cultural Resources in Prince George’s County, Maryland. Upper Marlboro, MD: The Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission, 2010. https://www.mncppcapps.org/planning/publications/pdfs/206/6%20Agriculture%20and%20Slavery%2009.pdf.

Patrick Stewart of Seat Pleasant



See “the many Patrick Stewarts” for the introduction to why this post was written.


Patrick Stewart of the Marsham Waring Inventory was 40 years old with an estimated birth year of 1820. Patrick Stewart of Seat Pleasant was 37 in the 1870 census, with an estimated birth year of 1833. It seems unlikely that they are the same Patrick Stewart. And as Patrick Stewart of Seat Pleasant is followed through the census records, it becomes even more unlikely that he is the Patrick Stewart of the Marsham Waring Inventory. In 1880, he was listed at 40, which shifted his birth year from 1833, to 1840, two decades after the Patrick Stewart of the Inventory was born; the same for the 1900 census, where he was listed as 60, making his birth year around 1840.

After Emancipation

In the 1870 US Census, Patrick Stewart and his wife, Lidia, are living near John E. Berry, the son of Dr. John E Berry. They are near the intersection of what is now Addison Road and Central Avenue in Seat Pleasant.

In 1880, Patrick Stewart is still living in Kent, the district formed from Bladensburg. In his household is Patrick and Mary Stewart, an elderly couple. Patrick is listed as 70 years old and Mary is listed as 65. They are most likely his parents. Patrick is enumerated as Pat. Hen., which is consistent with the land record that is recorded in 1892.

Patrick Henry Stewart purchased Lot #5 of the Seat Pleasant subdivision.  The land contained about 10.5 acres.  He paid $350 for the lot. (JWB 22:262; mdlandrec.net)

The land was situated near the corner of DC in the portion of Bladensburg District which was used to create the Kent District in the 1870s.  It sat on the former land of John E Berry, Jr., an enslaver and landowner in Prince George’s County prior to the Civil War.  Berry, Jr., purchased “Seat Pleasant” from his relative Thomas E Berry. At the close of the Civil War, the land was sold to real estate developers who created the town of Seat Pleasant.  Berry’s father, Dr. John E Berry, Sr., had a nearby plantation called Independence, and Berry’s brother, Albert B Berry had a farm called Sunnyside in addition to his other real estate holdings.

MSA_C2380_155_Jackson Plat of Seat Pleasant | Maryland State Archives
MSA_C2380_155_Jackson Plat of Seat Pleasant | Maryland State Archives

The survey of Seat Pleasant was completed in 1873.  In addition to detailing the lots, it marks what is likely the Seat Pleasant dwelling house and marks several cabins on the land, which may have be slave dwellings occupied by freedmen after manumission.  

A death certificate records Patrick Stewart’s death in May 1929, when he died from “entero-colitis”. It lists his occupation as farmer and at the time of his death, he was living in the District at 30 H Street NE, the household of John Thomas Stewart, his son. The death certificate also lists his parents as Patrick Stewart and Mary Ridout, names consistent with the 1880 census.

Before Emancipation

Prior to emancipation, Patrick (Henry) Stewart was enslaved by John E. Berry, who submitted a compensation list to the 1867 Commission on Slave Statistics; Berry was also the landowner of Seat Pleasant. Patrick (Henry) Stewart was listed as 20 years old, giving him an estimated birth year of 1845. Also enslaved by John E Berry is Mary Stewart (II), who was 38, born about 1827.

John E. Berry also submitted a list as administrator of the estate of Albert B Berry, his brother, who owned adjacent land. On the list submitted for A. B. Berry are Mary Stewart (I), age 58, and Alexander, age 22. Working from the assumption that Mary Stewart (I) is Mary Ridout, this allows us to expand the outline of the family. I wrote another detailed post about Mary Ridout and her connection with other Ridout Branches (and therefore the Stewart family).

In brief, Mary Ridout is likely related to Ridout Family Group enslaved by the Sprigg Family (Northhampton) and Waring Family. The Sprigg family enslaved Margaret (Brooks) Ridout who was the inferred mother of Barbara Ridout who married Joseph Jones, both enslaved by the Warings. Many of the Ridouts can be found in the vicinity of Seat Pleasant after emancipation. This suggests the likelihood that Mary Ridout was married to Patrick Stewart of the Waring estate.

Disambiguation

Patrick Henry Stewart of Seat Pleasant is too young to be Patrick Stewart of the Waring estate and he can be found in the compensation lists of John E Berry with other relatives. However, Patrick Henry Stewart is the son of Patrick Stewart of the Waring Inventory, as evidenced by the direct evidence of his death certificate which names his father and his mother’s family name. His mother’s family name, Ridout, provides indirect evidence that there were connection to the Stewart estate.

Mary Ridout | Stewart Connection


In 1929, Patrick Stewart, age 84, died of a stomach ailment. His son, J. T. Stewart, furnished the information for the death certificate for the District of Columbia records.

Patrick Stewart, age 84, was the son of Patrick Stewart and Mary Ridout. He was born around the year 1845, twenty years prior to the emancipation of the enslaved in Maryland, where he and his parents were born into chattel slavery.


Enslaved by John E Berry

In 1867, John E Berry, of Bladensburg in Prince George’s County, Maryland, submitted a list to the Commission of Prince George’s County Slave Statistics of the people he enslaved prior to emancipation in hopes of compensation from the federal government. Among those he listed were Patrick Stewart, age 20 and Mary Stewart, age 38.

While we do not have an age for Mary from the death certificate, the ages of the two Patricks are consistent with each other, both are born around 1845 — and Mary, the other Stewart, is old enough to have borne Patrick as her son.

The identification of Patrick’s mother as Mary Ridout opens up a line of inquiry about whether or not Mary Ridout is connected to the Stewarts of the Waring estates and to the Ridouts enslaved in and around the Waring estates.

Connected Posts: Barbara Jones | Ridout Family & Benjamin Lee and Augustus Jones | Stealing Horses

The connected posts discuss the details of this diagram more fully

Seat Pleasant

In the post on Barbara Jones’ connection to the Ridout family, we saw that Peter and Priscilla Ridout moved to the boundary between DC and Maryland, near Charles H Hays and we saw that Margaret (Peggy) Ridout and her daughter moved into the household of Geo R Wilfred Marshall, also near the boundary of DC and Maryland. The two families essentially bookend the area where Mary Stewart and her son Patrick are enslaved.

In the 1880s, Patrick Stewart purchased Lot #5 of the Seat Pleasant subdivision.  The land contained about 10.5 acres.  He paid $350 for the lot.

It sat on the former land of John E Berry, Jr. Berry, Jr., who purchased “Seat Pleasant” from his relative Thomas E Berry. At the close of the Civil War, the land was sold to real estate developers who created the town of Seat Pleasant.  Berry’s father, Dr. John E Berry, Sr., had a nearby plantation called Independence, and Berry’s brother, Albert B Berry had a farm called Sunnyside in addition to his other real estate holdings.  The survey of Seat Pleasant was completed in 1873.  In addition to detailing the lots, it marks what is likely the Seat Pleasant dwelling house and marks several cabins on the land, which may have be slave dwellings occupied by freedmen after emancipation.  

In the 1870 census, Patrick and his wife, Lidia, are living with their three daughters: Mary E [1864], Margaret [1866], and Rachel [1868]. By 1880, they have five more children: William [1870], Daniel [1872], John Thomas [1874], Jane E [1876], and Christiana [1880]. The name of their last daughter, Christiana illustrates the connection with the Ridout family. As seen, Barbara Ridout Jones had both a sister and daughter named a variation of Christiana.

Mary Ridout Stewart

Mary Ridout Stewart was living next door to her son, Patrick, in the 1870 census in the household of George and Grace Johnson and their children.

1870 Census for Bladensburg District in Prince George’s County | ancestry.com

This leads us to the suggestion that Grace is Mary’s daughter and Patrick’s sister.

Like Mary and Patrick Stewart, George Johnson was enslaved by John E Berry.  The two men likely worked the tobacco fields of Seat Pleasant, first as enslaved men and then as tenant farmers.  

Unlike the Patrick and George who were held in bondage on a large tobacco estate, Grace and her children were enslaved by a farmer, Charles H Hays, who likely grew produce for the Washington markets.  Hay’s farm was north of Seat Pleasant, along the DC border, where Peter and Priscilla moved after the war. 

When large estates were often valued above $10,000, Hay’s farm was valued at $2000.   Farms were smaller in this part of Prince George’s County and often grew other products instead of tobacco.  In 1864, Charles Hays advertised a reward of $5 for a cow that had strayed.  Upon his death, his farm of 105 acres was advertised for sale; the soil was described as well adapted for grazing and market gardening.  The land had a dwelling of six rooms and a tenement house of three rooms.  

The 1860 Slave Schedule lists 8 enslaved people for Hays, and Hays submitted the names of 10 people whom he enslaved. In addition to Grace and her children, Hays enslaved Letty Hanson, age 25.  Her first name is phonetically similar to that of Lidia, Patrick’s wife.  


By 1880, Mary Ridout Stewart and her husband, Patrick Stewart, are living together in the household of Patrick Stewart and Lidia with their children. Patrick (Jr.) has yet to buy the land in Seat Pleasant. From neighboring houses, it appears that they are living near Buena Vista near the Waring Estates, in the newly created Kent District along the boundary with Queen Anne District and near close and extended family.

Dwelling NumberRelativeRelationship to Mary Ridout
253Patrick Stewart (Sr.)Husband
253Patrick Stewart (Jr.)Son
258Grace JohnsonDaughter
247Michael JonesSon of Barbara’s brother-in-law
244Bettie FletcherBarbara’s sister in law
92Geo StewartInferred Nephew, as he is son of James Stewart

The table lists the dwelling numbers of people related within the extended kin group of Mary Ridout. Dwellings 253 & 258 are members of her immediate family and include her children. Dwellings 247 and 244 are members of the Jones family that Barbara Ridout, Mary’s inferred sister, partnered with. Elizabeth (Bettie) Fletcher was the daughter of Richard and Mary Jones. And dwelling 92, which can be identified as being in the geographic vicinity as it is neighboring Jos. K Roberts house is the household of George Stewart, the son of James Stewart.

James Stewart was listed in Marsham Waring’s 1860 inventory with Notley Stewart, who fathered Barbara Ridout Jones’s grandchild, Augustus Jones. Also listed with James and Notley was Patrick Stewart. During the Civil War and shortly after the abolition of slavery in the District, Patrick and Notley fled to DC with many others from the Waring estates. James Waring, as administrator of his father’s estate, went to the District to seek their return, swearing an affidavit that they were from Maryland and therefore subject to his enslavement. Records of Patrick Stewart are not found, though records of the others in Camp Barker and Camp Springdale have been found. Likewise, Patrick in the 1870 census has yet to be identified. However, it appears he reunited with his family by 1880.

related posts